ASIAdocument.write(“” + m[today.getMonth()+1]+ ” “+ today.getDate()+”, ” + theYear + ” “);HOMECHINAWORLDBUSINESSLIFESTYLECULTURETRAVELSPORTSOPINIONREGIONALFORUMNEWSPAPERChina Daily PDFChina Daily E-paperChina Daily Global PDFChina Daily Global E-paperOpinion / Chen WeihuaEditorialsOp-EdColumnistsContributorsCartoonsSpecialsFrom the PressForum TrendsTalk from streetDebateEditors Pick:Syrian refugeescyberspaceV-Day paradeshrimp scandalTPPObjectivity falls prey to need for soundbite in US electionBy Chen Weihua (China Daily) Updated:2016-11-04 09:00Comments Print Mail Large Medium SmallDemocratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton (L) and Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump arrive before the second presidential debate at Washington University in St. Louis, Sunday, Oct 9, 2016. [Photo/IC]The 2016 US presidential election will produce a winner and a loser on Nov 8. To me, the losers will also include the US news media, which has lost its journalism objectivity in covering the race.
Recently, I was on a panel of international journalists discussing the 2016 election that was organized by the Columbia Global Centers and held in the Pulitzer Hall at Columbia University. Since I believe that journalists should be observers, not participants, I asked if the way the US news media has covered the election means the demise of objective US journalism.
Never did I expect that my words would make the headline of an article on the Columbia Journalism Review website the next day.
Bias in the news media has become obvious since before the primaries when US news outlets devoted disproportional space and time to Donald Trump, compared with 16 other Republican candidates who either withdrew or suspended their campaigns during the primaries. This was despite the fact that Trump did not score high during the initial polls compared to his rivals.
It doesnt take an expert to figure out that for many news organizations, Trumps often politically incorrect or outrageous language has been good for their ratings and readership numbers.
A study by the Harvards Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy in June found that Trump received the equivalent of $55 million in free advertising from several major news outlets, including that worth $16 million from New York Times alone. The study concluded: “Trump is arguably the first bona fide media-created presidential nominee.”
Meanwhile, the campaigns of candidates such as Bernie Sanders, were grossly under-reported. Most US news organizations have a tradition of endorsing a particular candidate, but that should not undermine the objectivity and fairness of their reporting.
However, this is what has happened during this campaign. If you read a US newspaper or watch a US TV channel these days about the election news, you can immediately tell which candidate they have endorsed.
That means they are not informing their readers and viewers but misinforming them.
For example, the news media has shown such enthusiasm for covering and spinning Trumps lewd conversation about women recorded on video many years ago that it overshadowed the coverage of serious campaign issues such as economy, terrorism, foreign policy, gun control and immigration－the main election issues for voters according to Pew Center surveys.
On the other hand, most news outlets have not shown nearly the same kind of passion to dig into the scandal of the Democratic National Committees treatment of Bernie Sanders when he was competing with Hillary Clinton for the Democratic ticket.
A national Quinnipiac University poll released on Oct 19 showed that 55 percent of likely voters surveyed described the media as biased against Trump, while 42 percent, mostly Democrats, said there is no media bias against him.
On election night, New York-based ProPublica, which claims to be an independent news organization of investigative journalism, will launch a nationwide network of journalists, journalism students and concerned citizens to track and report on problems that prevent people from voting.
That could also include tracking and reporting the problems of US news organizations in covering the 2016 election.
The author is deputy editor of China Daily USA. email@example.comRelated StoriesUS election rhetoric unlikely to foreshadow future US-China relationsThe paradox of the US election and where to go next2016 US election: Will US-China relations change?US election paraphernalia: netizens thumbs-upMost Viewed Todays Top NewsFive reasons why foreign enterprises start a business in ChinaWill Nies case prevent wrong court verdicts?Which way will supervision reform move?How promising is the cutting of red tape?Local govts subsidies for property purchases serve their own interestsForum TrendsDo men face a stigma of being domestic violence victims?Are parents oversharing on social media?Does Victorias Secret fashion show objectify women?Should students get paid for good grades?Should single women be allowed to have kids?Should for-profit private schools be banned?Are single-sex schools better than co-ed schools?ColumnistsTrump can learn lessons from European leadersBalancing eloquence and silenceFeatured ContributorsChina ushers in new FTAAP eraWuzhen sees how internet could breach the gap of time and spaceStar BloggersA reflection: My life in 2016 By Judy ZhuThe year 2016 marks my second time saying farewell to full-time motherhood and back to “normal”.Why Europe should work with China By François de la ChevalerieIn this period of ever-growing protectionism, will Europe grant Market Economy Status to China? In 2001, the signatory countries of the Doha Development Round agreed that in 2016, at the latest, China would be granted the status.How I spend my birthday in China By Shark MinnowAnother year gone, another year to reflect!Special2017 Outlook-Lead economists take on the economy of China and the world2016 Story roundup from expats who know China best2016 Mastering China …| About China Daily | Advertise on Site | Contact Us | Job Offer | Expat Employment |Copyright 1995 -var oTime = new Date();
document.write(oTime.getFullYear());. All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.License for publishing multimedia online 0108263 Registration Number: 130349